A question
for American lawmakers about Ukraine
Imagine that freedom was in decline around the world. Imagine
that things had gotten so bad that a dictatorship actually invaded a democracy
with the express goal of destroying its freedoms and its people. And
yet... imagine that this people fought back. Imagine that their leaders
stayed in the country. Imagine that this people got themselves together,
supported and joined their armed forces, held back an invasion of what seemed
like overwhelming force. Imagine that their resistance is a bright moment
in the history of democracy this whole century. We don't have to imagine:
that attack came from Russia and those people are the Ukrainians. Would
you sell them out?
“Nearest bomb shelter,” TS, Kyiv, 9/2023
Americans have an alliance in North America and Europe which has
existed for more than seventy years, with the goal of preventing an attack from
the Soviet Union and then from Russia. Imagine that, when the Russian
attack came, the hammer fell on a country excluded from that alliance.
Ukraine indeed took the entire brunt of the invasion, resisted, and turned the
tide: a task assigned to countries whose economies, taken together, are two
hundred fifty times larger than Ukraine's. In so doing, Ukraine destroyed
so much Russian equipment that a Russian attack on NATO became highly
improbable. With the blood of tens of thousands of its soldiers,
Ukrainians defended every member of that alliance, making it far less likely
that Americans would have to go to war in Europe. Would you sell them
out?
(If there is anyone out there who still thinks that NATO had
anything to do with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, consider this: invading
Ukraine made Russia far more vulnerable. If Russia actually feared NATO, invading
Ukraine would be the last thing it would do. Russian leaders are perfectly
aware that NATO will not invade Russia, which is why they can pull troops away
from the borders of NATO members Norway and Finland and send them to kill Ukrainians.)
Upgrade to paid
For this whole century, American politicians and strategists of
all political orientations have agreed that the greatest threat for a global
war comes from China. The scenario for this dreadful conflict, in which hundreds
of thousands of American soldiers could fight and die, is a Chinese offensive
against Taiwan. And now imagine that this can defused at no cost and with
no risk. The offensive operation the Chinese leadership is watching right
now is that of Russia against Ukraine. Ukrainian resistance has
demonstrated how difficult a Chinese offensive operation in the Pacific would
be. The best China policy is a good Ukraine policy. Will we toss
away the tremendous and unanticipated geopolitical gain that has been handed to
us by Ukraine? There is nothing that we could have done on our own to so
effectively deter China as what the Ukrainians are doing, and what the
Ukrainians are doing is in no way hostile towards China. Ukrainians are
keeping us safe in this as in other ways. Would you sell them out?
Imagine, because it's true, that the whole world is watching the
war in Ukraine. From everyone else's point of view, whether they like us,
hate us, or don't care about us, Ukraine seems like an obvious ally and an easy
win for the United States. Anyone around the world, regardless of their
own ideology, knows that Ukraine is a democracy and America is supposed to
support democracies. Anyone around the world, regardless of the state of
their own economy, knows that our economy is enormous, far larger than
Russia's, and that economic strength wins wars. Anyone around the world
can easily see that Americans are not at risk in Ukraine, and that Americans
draw extraordinary moral and geopolitical gains from Ukrainian
resistance. From the point of view of all observers, in other words,
defunding Ukraine would demonstrate enormous American weakness. Is that
the face we want to show the world? Do we want to tell everyone that we
are unreliable and unaware of our own interests? Ukrainians, with
American help, make Americans look sensible and strong. Would you sell
them out?
Imagine that this is a winnable war, because it is. Russia's
main strategic objective, the seizure of Kyiv, was not achieved. Ukraine
won the Battle of Kyiv. Russia was forced to retreat from Kyiv and
Chernihiv and Sumy oblasts. Imagine the Russia's campaign to take Kharkiv
failed. Ukraine won the Battle of Kharkiv. Imagine that Kherson,
the one regional capital Russia has taken in this war, was taken back by
Ukraine. Ukraine won the Battle of Kherson. Snake Island, lost
early in the war, has been taken back by Ukraine. Ukraine has taken back
more than half of the territory seized by Russia in this invasion.
Knowing that all is this is true, imagine that Putin knows it too.
Russia's main offensive instrument, the paramilitary Wagner Group, staged a coup against Putin and that Putin had to kill
its leader. Imagine that Putin knows he cannot really take much more
Ukrainian land -- not without American help, anyway. Ukraine has a theory
of victory that involves gains on the battlefield. Putin has a theory of
victory that involves votes in the US Congress. Putin thinks that he has a
better chance in the Capitol than he has in Kyiv. Should we prove him
right?
Posad Pokrovs’ke, Kherson oblast, deoccupied by Ukrainian
army, TS 9/23
Imagine a world food system with Ukraine as a major node.
In normal times Ukraine can feed four hundred million people, and usually the
UN World Food Program depends upon Ukraine. Ukrainian exports feed some
of the most sensitive parts of the Middle East and Africa. Much of the
instability in those regions is related to shortages of food. Russia has
destroyed a major dam to destroy Ukrainian farmland. And mined Ukrainian
farms on a huge scale. Russia targets ports and grain storage facilities with its
missiles, and claims the piratical right to stop all shipping on the Black Sea
with its navy. And yet... Imagine that Ukrainians resist here as
well. Ukrainians farmers are hard at work. Ukraine still supplies
food to the World Food Program. Ukrainians, through their own innovative
weapons and clever tactics, managed to intimidate the Black Sea Fleet and open
a lane for commercial shipping. That they are feeding the people who
needed to be fed. Would you sell them out?
Ukrainian self-made demining tractor. TS, 9/23
Imagine that we were a country that cared about war
crimes. And imagine that there was a law, an international genocide
convention, that defined five actions that constitute genocide, and that Russians have committed
every one of these crimes in Ukraine. I cannot keep on writing about
"imagining" when I have seen some of the death pits myself. I
cannot say "imagine" when writers I know have been murdered because
they represent Ukrainian culture. I cannot stay with my device when I
read that the Russian state boasts of having taken 700,000 Ukrainian children to be russified, when every day
Russian propagandists make clear that Russian war aims
are exterminationist. And yet Ukrainians resist and persist. This
is a genocide that can be stopped, that is being stopped. We are living
within the scenario, the one we say that we have been waiting for, when
American actions can stop a genocide, simply by helping the people who have
been targeted, simply by paying their taxes. Whenever the Ukrainians take
back land, they rescue people. This is how they think of their liberated
territories: as places where no more children will be kidnaped, no more
civilians will tortured, no more local leaders will be murdered. Would
you sell out a people to a genocidal occupation? A people that has done
nothing but good for you?
I have heard the excuse that Americans are
"fatigued." I have been in Ukraine three times since the war
began. I have been in the capital and in the provinces. I have seen
almost no Americans, fatigued or otherwise, in the country. And that is
for the simple reason that we are not in Ukraine. How can we be fatigued
by a war we are not fighting? When we are not even present? This
makes no sense. It causes no fatigue to give money to the right cause,
which is all that we are doing. It feels good to help other people help
themselves in a good cause.
If we stop supporting Ukraine, then everything gets worse, all
of a sudden, and no one will be talking about “fatigue” because we will all be
talking about disaster: across all of these dimensions: food supply, war
crimes, international instability, expanding war, collapsing democracies.
Everything that the Ukrainians are doing for us can be reversed if we give up.
Why would lawmakers even contemplate doing so?
If you happened to know lots of Ukrainians, as I do, you would
know people who have been wounded or who have been killed. You would know
people who get through their days with dark circles around their eyes, because
everyone has dark circles around their eyes. You would know people who
have lost someone, because everyone has lost someone. You would know
people who are grieving and yet who are nevertheless doing what they can
do. You would not know anyone in Ukraine who believes that fatigue is a
reason to give up. Would you sell such people out?
I have heard the other excuse: that we need to audit the weapons
we send to Ukraine. The expenses are minimal and the gains are great: a
nickel on our defense dollar, achieving what we cannot ourselves do with all
the rest. And here's the thing: the weapons we send to Ukraine are the
only ones in our stockpiles that are being audited. They are being
audited not by accountants in suits and ties but by men and women in
camouflage. They are being used and used well by people whose lives are
at stake and whose country's future is at stake. Ukrainians have used
American air defense more effectively than anyone knew that it could be
used.
Ukrainians are using American missiles that we consider outdated
to destroy the most advanced Russian assets. Ukrainians are taking
American weapons built in the last century and using them to defend themselves
and the rest of us in this one. In large measure they are literally using
arms that we would otherwise be paying to disassemble because we regard them as
obsolete.
If that battlefield audit done by the Ukrainian army is not good
enough: well, then, by all means, American lawmakers, come and visit Ukraine
and see for yourself. You and your staffers would be very welcome.
Ukrainians want you to come. It would be a very good thing if more of us
visited Ukraine.
I will tell you what I witnessed in Ukraine: when Ukrainians see
American weapons systems, they applaud. Would you sell them out?
Share
Thinking about... is a reader-supported
publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free
or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
PS. This piece was written
with legislators in mind. Please share this with you elected representatives,
and please contact them and tell them that you support the proposed support
package for Ukraine. If you wish to take direct action for Ukrainians, please
consider supporting my drone-detection fundraiser. If you wish to help Ukrainians
chronicle
.jpg)
